Archive for November, 2007

It’s Worth a Shot

Hillary Clinton’s campaign office in Rochester, New Hampshire is under siege:

(CNN) — Two people are being held hostage by an armed man at Sen. Hillary Clinton’s campaign office in Rochester, New Hampshire, police said Friday.

While the tendency to blame a Republican whacko is almost too hard to overcome, I think that, at this point in the election, we need to be looking at supporters of Clinton’s primary opponents.

I just hope no one is hurt, especially since HillaryCare isn’t there to make sure their bills get paid.

Leave a Comment

Power Corrupts…

BOLINGBROOK, Illinois (AP) — Eighteen times in two years, Bolingbrook police were called to fellow officer Drew Peterson’s home because of trouble between husband and wife.

But Peterson’s wife could never get authorities to arrest him. In fact, she was the only one ever charged.

Now residents of this Chicago suburb are wondering whether police were protecting one of their own — and whether they bear some responsibility for what happened next.

Could it be? Could the trusty government and its law enforcement squad have been covering for one of their own? Say it isn’t so!

What’s worse, if it is true, there is no suitable recourse. Maybe he loses his job, and at “best”, the taxpayers get to pay a hefty sum of money to the family.

Heck of a system we’ve got going here.

Leave a Comment

Glen Dean: Huckabee is No Conservative

Here is Glen Dean’s take on Mike Huckabee:

Huckabee is no conservative. He is a big spending, bleeding heart liberal. Sure he may be “socially conservative”, but that term is an oxymoron.

In fact, anytime the word social is put in front of the word conservative, just go ahead and cross out the conservative part, because the politician in question surely isn’t one. Huckabee is a disaster. In fact he is even less conservative than George Bush, the President who expanded government even more than Lyndon Johnson.

I am inclined to agree. It seems like everything Huckabee wants will require a big government to accomplish. I have said before that you cannot be both a social conservative and a small government conservative, because it takes government to police morals. I think Glen is right on the money here.

Leave a Comment

An Open Letter to Roland Martin

Mr. Martin,

I am writing in response to your latest column, “Colleges block black coaches out … again.” You see, I do not think there are enough transvestite drag queens writing opinion columns for CNN, and as such, think you should be replaced with someone meeting the aforementioned criteria. I hardly care about their qualifications, just that they are a transvestite drag queen. THAT is what is important.

If CNN cannot settle on a transvestite drag queen, I demand that they at least interview 10 of them before allowing you to keep your job. The transvestite drag queen population is drastically under-represented in the mainstream media and I demand an immediate solution to this tragedy.

I assume, Mr. Martin, that you would like to keep your job. I assume, further, that you believe CNN has the right to decide that it wants to publish YOUR opinions without first parading (literally) 10 transvestite drag queens into their offices for meaningless interviews. That is how hiring works (or at least should work) in America.

Your writing does an enormous disservice to the African-Americans who have rightfully earned their positions among the coaching ranks. Because of drivel such as this column, men who received their jobs because of hard work and excellence are thrown in with those who receive handouts.

You claim that your proposal is about giving African-Americans a fair shake in the job market. It seems clear to me that, if an owner or athletic director is willing to overlook a more talented African-American coach in order to hire an inferior white coach, the negative results of the decision will be borne out on the playing field. That is how markets, the job market included, work. The world doesn’t need you, or anyone else, enforcing dumb rules to make things look fair.

I look forward to next week’s column by a transvestite drag queen.

Comments (1)

If You’ve Got Some Extra Liberty Laying Around, I’ll Take It

This bit from the Bob & Tom show is definitely worth the time it takes to download. It is from a comedian named Geechy Guy. I actually heard this tonight on a re-run of the tonight show from the 90s.

Pretty funny stuff.

Leave a Comment

Andrew Sullivan: GOP Candidates Wrong on Energy

Andrew Sullivan summarizes his angle on the government’s role in the development of alternative energy sources:

Don’t conservatives understand that the best solution is for government to provide market incentives for new technologies, rather than trying to come up with the solution itself? Sure, some basic research support – but then leave it to the private sector to generate new ideas, and the market to see which ones will fly.

I say we go a step further. Government’s Role = 0%, Market’s Role = 100%.

That shouldn’t be too hard for the candidates to remember.

Leave a Comment

Stephen King: Waterboard Jenna Bush

I do not necessarily like his books, but this is a great idea:

Horror writer Stephen King has a solution for how to prove once and for all whether waterboarding is torture: Have Jenna Bush try it.

Couldn’t hurt, could it?

Comments (3)

Christians Cannot Justify Torture

Dr. Elrod says torture is a moral issue:

People of faith from across the country are joining to declare: “Torture is a Moral Issue” in the National Religious Campaign Against Torture (NRCAT).

I agree.

Leave a Comment

Gatorade Inventor Dead at 80

Dr. Robert Cade died in Florida today. Reading this article about the history of Gatorade gave me a lot to think about. Particularly, this part:

After the Gators beat Georgia Tech 27-12 in the Orange Bowl in 1967, Tech coach Bobby Dodd told reporters his team lost because, “We didn’t have Gatorade … that made the difference.”

If you know me, you know that I am kinda picky about rules. I think rules can be good, but are often designed very poorly. This is different from my view about government and laws. I understand that, in things like football, people are voluntarily playing and, thus, it is okay for rules to limit freedom. However, this doesn’t necessarily mean that rules should always impose such limits.

So, here’s my question: Would the University of Florida get in trouble today for using a fluid which no other team had access to? Would they be allowed to use Gatorade without making it available to their opponents?

I doubt it, but maybe I am wrong. Our culture has become so obsessed with fairness and equality that we have stopped, in many cases, rewarding innovation. We forget that something which gives one team an edge today might benefit all teams later. Instead, the hold back those who can excel for the sake of those who lag behind.

So the basic question is whether something that a) helps performance, b) isn’t harmful to those who take it, and c) is only available to certain people would be allowed in college or any other sports? If the answer is no, I think we have a rule that is a bit off base.

Leave a Comment

Divorcing the State

UPDATED: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/26/opinion/26coontz.html

I knew it! I knew I was not the only person with this crazy idea:

WHY do people — gay or straight — need the state’s permission to marry? For most of Western history, they didn’t, because marriage was a private contract between two families. The parents’ agreement to the match, not the approval of church or state, was what confirmed its validity.

To think that the state is required for marriage is just silly. Sure, some things would need to change, but on the whole, the switch would be beneficial.

We need to stop thinking about ourselves in the terms given to us by the state.

Comments (2)

Older Posts »