Archive for September, 2007

This is Why You Should Vote for Ron Paul…

From his campaign website:

Whenever I face a hit piece on tv, or a smear in a newspaper column, I remember my secret weapon: you. In establishment politics, people make campaign contributions because they want something: a contract, a subsidy, a special-interest deal. But the thousands of people who contribute to this campaign want no favors from big government — which must come at the expense of their fellow citizens, and sometimes our soldiers’ lives. They want only what is their God-given, natural, and constitutional right: their freedom.

Usually, you are safe not believing anything out of the mouth of politicians, but Ron Paul’s entire political life has centered around this idea.  He’s right that government favors come from the expense of other Americans, sometimes their entire lives.

Comments (4)

It Began With the Death Penalty

The Supreme Court is taking a look at the constitutionality of lethal injections.

I’m pretty sure that the first issue I took an anti-Conservative position on was the death penalty. I grew up a card carrying social conservative, but I remember beginning to think that the death penalty didn’t seem right. I just didn’t think the government should be killing people. Of course, I didn’t apply the same logic across the board, but that would come later. Killing someone is irreversible. I’m not willing to give that power to the government, especially one that can’t balance the budget, lies to us, and keeps getting caught with its collective pants down.

Leave a Comment

Sports, Lies, and Videotape

The New England Patriots were punished this week for videotaping the Jets play-calling signs in last week’s game. Let me first say that I am not a huge sports guy, and usually defer to my more knowledgeable friends on such issues. That said, I can’t stay away from this one.

This rule seems antiquated. Filming technology is cheap and easy to use. Therefore, there’s nothing stopping every team from doing it. If everyone did it, teams would develop more secretive ways of play calling, thus nullifying the usefulness of current technology. This is known as “the market process.” Instead of helping the situation, this rule actually creates a black market for the use of filming technology. Precisely because it is against the rules, teams can use it to their advantage. If it was okay to use the technology, no single team would have an advantage.

Why do I take this view? Because even though the Patriots are now being punished for their participation in the filming black market, no one can fully understand the impact of their use of the technology. The proper degree of punishment is impossible to determine. So, when in doubt, overestimate.

The bottom line: Rules that create black markets are not so good. You COULD apply the same logic to steroids, with the caveat that the league does have a legitimate interest in protecting its players from the negative bodily effect of their use. If steroids didn’t have that negative effect, however, I would have no problem allowing their use. Black markets, not the lack of rules, cause the inequalities that make sports less enjoyable.

Comments (7)

BlogWatch: Toilet Economics

The toilet seat is pretty important to me. Apparently, it is also pretty important to Glen Whitman at Agoraphilia:

There is something to be said for keeping peace in the household by making small sacrifices. If the women in our lives really think toilet-seat-down is that big a deal, then a wasteful extra hand motion is a small price to pay for domestic tranquility. And if it seems like I think it’s a big deal, that’s only because I get a perverse joy from blogging about the economics of everyday things (in my real life, I generally capitulate to the always-down norm).

Whitman talks about Tyler Cowen’s book, Discovering Your Inner Economist, a book I recommend reading. In the book, Cowen points out that, although the economically efficient outcome is to always leave the toilet seat how it is when you are finished, it might be worth always putting it down (men) because of the signal it will send to the women you love.

This was an important lesson for me when I read the book. Although toilet seat issues have never been a problem in any home I have lived in, I’ve always (humorously) advocated the economically efficient position. Cowen’s revelation, which Whitman takes issue with and attempts to refine, is that the value of sending a signal (even a costly one) may be higher than the cost incurred to do so.

Translation: You may have to compromise economic efficiency by putting the toilet seat down, but it may be worth it.

Comments (2)

Petraeus

At the risk of being the only blog on the Internet without a post on the topic, I’ll chime in.  I am not a fan of war, and I mean that on multiple levels.  Not only is the actual act of war unappealing to me, most of the conversation about it leaves me entirely disinterested.  Yes, some good things have come after wars (ending slavery, nazism, etc.), but rarely do we get to see evidence of the potential efficacy of less costly solutions.  When war “works,” it looks like a great idea.  When it doesn’t it’s seen as tragic.  Something is missing in that equation.

Anyway…

The Petraeus Report was so conveniently aligned with the sixth anniversary of 9/11 (btw, this is the closest relationship 9/11 and Iraq have ever had).  It’s almost as if the actual content of the report doesn’t even matter.  As long as Congress keeps funding the war, there’s little else they can do.

In short, I fear that this report was a lot of bark and not much bite.

Leave a Comment

Letter to the Editor: Consistency Is Lacking in FISA Debate

The Arlington Sun Gazette published my latest letter to the editor.

Topic this time, Arlington’s lack of consistency when it comes to government intervention:

By and large, Arlingtonians love government. We gave our county a billion dollars to play with this year. We want our representatives to vote to give the government more power over issues like welfare, labor wages and health care.Where is the cynicism about government when it comes to these issues?

Leave a Comment

Couch Competitor

Last year, I joined my first fantasy football league. I did much better than I expected and really enjoyed getting borderline addicted to tracking my players’ stats.

This was (is) Week 1 of the 2007 season. I didn’t think much about fantasy football in the “off season,” but it is back in full force. Let me introduce you to the starting line-up for Week 1:

David Garrard
Terrell Owens
Reggie Bush
Todd Heap
Donald Driver
Marty Booker
Adam Vinatieri
Gibril Wilson
Antoine Bethea
Keith Brooking

Needless to say, I have already made some adjustments for Week 2. However, as long as Todd Heap doesn’t get outscored by Anquan Boldin and Joe Nedney by more than 13.53 points, I’ll win!

I love being a couch competitor. It even works if I’m not on the couch. These guys work even when I’m not watching!

Comments (2)

BlogWatch: No Education Competition in Arlington

The Arlington County Taxpayers Association blog wonders where Arlington’s education money is going:

What a system! For 880 fewer students, APS gets another 178.7 teachers. Decreasing productivity and increasing teacher pay. Wow! Life for APS top management is indeed good because there is no competition. Granted, it didn’t happen in one swoop, but the mumbers should be raising questions among Arlington taxpayers if not at the Education Center on North Quincy Street.

Here’s a bit of math that Arlington educators clearly missed: Money + Problem != Solution

Leave a Comment

BlogWatch: Regulations and Bail Outs

Once again, The Moratorium Site says what I’m thinking better than I could have:

WHAT????? So, we need Govco to bail out these folks who decided to buy a home they couldn’t afford? A home they just had to have (along with that huge SUV, flat screen TV and digital cable). Oh, and while we are at it, SCREW the businesses. We will give all the help (via your tax dollars) to the individual who made a bad business decision but not to the business who took the chance on that individual? Who took the risk that they would pay? What a bunch of BS!

People need to understand that if you don’t let businesses charge whatever interest rates that allow them to mitigate their own risk, they will simply stop lending money to high-risk people all together. Then, risky people who do end up paying their bills will be punished.

The current system at least punishes the irresponsible, not the responsible.

Leave a Comment

Letter to the Editor: What’s a Simple Contract Matter to God?

The Richmond Times-Dispatch has published my letter to the editor about marriage. Here’s a link to the Times website and an excerpt:

Christians should not coerce homosexuals out of marriage rights, just as homosexuals with the right to marry should not coerce churches into performing those ceremonies. The only way to remove the coercive force is to remove all laws regarding the subject. In this case, marriage would be available to all citizens, but churches could decide which wedding to perform.

Comments (5)